Clicky

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
89
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Introduced June 2010
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Below is a in-depth review of the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is relatively close but the Z950 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") use totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Z950 was unveiled 7 months before the XZ-1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Z950 matches up vs the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus XZ-1

 Z950 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak Z950

 XZ-1 Z950 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011June 2010More recent by 7 months
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus XZ-1

 Z950 XZ-1 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z950 provides exterior measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z950 and the XZ-1.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and XZ-1 is 89 and 88 respectively.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z950 and XZ-1.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Z950 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Kodak Z950 will provide you with more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Z950 will be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z950 Portrait photography information
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography information
29
manual focus
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
45
you can focus manually
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Z950
Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (243g)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
heavier than others (275g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z950 Sports photography factors
Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography factors
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
great battery pack (320 CIPA)
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z950 Travel photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography details
52
flash built-in
long zoom (350mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (243g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
62
great battery pack (320 per charge)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than others (275g)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Z950
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
37
manual focus
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
54
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (320 shots)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z950 Vlogging features
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging features
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (243 grams)
31
decently wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic support
heavier than others (275 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z950 and Olympus XZ-1
 Kodak EasyShare Z950Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z950 Olympus XZ-1
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-06-16 2011-01-26
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance 6cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 4.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 1/8s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/1250s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.40 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 243g (0.54 lb) 275g (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 34
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 pictures
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7003 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $250 $567