Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
![Kodak EasyShare Z950 front Kodak EasyShare Z950 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Z950/Kodak-Z950-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25/Panasonic-FS25-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Kodak Z950 versus Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Z950 was manufactured 17 months later than the FS25 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Z950 scores versus the FS25 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Panasonic FS25
Z950 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Kodak Z950
FS25 | Z950 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Panasonic FS25
Z950 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z950 has outer measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z950 versus Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Z950 versus the FS25.
![Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and FS25 is 89 and 95 respectively.
![Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z950 and FS25.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images however you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer Z950 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 243g (0.54 lbs) | 148g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7003 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $250 | $230 |