Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS30
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Kodak Z950 and Panasonic ZS25, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and ZS25 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z950 was released 3 years earlier than the ZS25 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Z950 matches up versus the ZS25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Panasonic ZS25
| Z950 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Kodak Z950
| ZS25 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | June 2010 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Panasonic ZS25
| Z950 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z950 has got physical measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z950 and Panasonic ZS25 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Z950 compared to the ZS25.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z950 and ZS25 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Z950 and ZS25.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS25 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older Z950 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Z950 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 6cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243 grams (0.54 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $300 |