Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z950 was announced 10 months later than the CX2 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the Z950 scores vs the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Ricoh CX2
| Z950 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 | August 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Kodak Z950
| CX2 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Ricoh CX2
| Z950 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z950 features physical dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Z950 and the CX2.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Z950 and CX2 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z950 and CX2.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Kodak Z950 to produce extra detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Z950 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 6cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243 gr (0.54 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $250 | $341 |