Clicky

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
89
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Announced June 2010
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Below is a complete overview of the Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Z950 was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Z950 grades vs the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Ricoh WG-4

 Z950 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Kodak Z950

 WG-4 Z950 
LaunchedFebruary 2014June 2010More recent by 44 months
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Ricoh WG-4

 Z950 WG-4 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z950 has physical dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Z950 versus the WG-4.

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and WG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z950 and WG-4.

To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to result in greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older Z950 will be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z950 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography details
29
manual focus
no external flash support
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
41
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak Z950 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography highlights
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than others in class (243g)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z950 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Sports photography camera
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250s)
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z950 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography info
52
built-in flash
long reach (350mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (243 grams)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
72
environment sealing
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z950 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography advice
37
manual focus
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Timelapse recording
54
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery (240 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Z950
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (243g)
36
rather wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z950 and Ricoh WG-4
 Kodak EasyShare Z950Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z950 Ricoh WG-4
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2010-06-16 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Max boosted ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range 6cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.40 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 243 grams (0.54 lb) 230 grams (0.51 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7003 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $250 $330