Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak Z950 and Ricoh WG-80, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z950 was announced 13 years before the WG-80 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Z950 scores versus the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Ricoh WG-80
| Z950 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Kodak Z950
| WG-80 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 145 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Ricoh WG-80
| Z950 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z950 features physical dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z950 and Ricoh WG-80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Z950 compared to the WG-80.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Z950 and WG-80 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Z950 and WG-80.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-80 to deliver extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Z950 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 6cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.70" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243 gr (0.54 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $250 | $300 |