Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Kodak Z950 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z950 was revealed at a similar time to the HZ35W which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Z950 matches up versus the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Samsung HZ35W
| Z950 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Kodak Z950
| HZ35W | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Samsung HZ35W
| Z950 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 | June 2010 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak Z950 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z950 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z950 against the HZ35W.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Z950 and HZ35W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z950 and HZ35W.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you have to factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 6cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243g (0.54 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $300 |