Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
45 Overall
39
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Kodak Z950 and Samsung WB210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z950 was introduced 13 months earlier than the WB210 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Z950 matches up vs the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Samsung WB210
| Z950 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Kodak Z950
| WB210 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Samsung WB210
| Z950 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z950 enjoys exterior dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z950 and Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Z950 against the WB210.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and WB210 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z950 and WB210.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB210 to result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged Z950 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 6cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243 gr (0.54 lb) | 174 gr (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $250 | $279 |