Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z950 was brought out 3 years before the WB800F and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Z950 matches up vs the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Samsung WB800F
| Z950 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak Z950
| WB800F | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Samsung WB800F
| Z950 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Kodak Z950 offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Z950 against the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Z950 and WB800F is 89 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z950 and WB800F.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB800F to offer greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older Z950 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z950 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 243g (0.54 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $300 |