Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
94 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Kodak Z980 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z980 was brought out 5 years before the TG-630 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the Z980 grades against the TG-630 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| Z980 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Kodak Z980
| TG-630 iHS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 201k | Crisper screen (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| Z980 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Z980 has exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z980 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Z980 and the TG-630 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z980 and TG-630 iHS is 68 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Z980 and TG-630 iHS.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files however you should really consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged Z980 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 201 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $249 | $200 |