Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the Z980 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z980 was launched 3 years earlier than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Z980 scores vs the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus XZ-1
| Z980 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak Z980
| XZ-1 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 201k | Sharper screen (+413k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus XZ-1
| Z980 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 features exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Z980 and the XZ-1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and XZ-1 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z980 and XZ-1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Z980 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Kodak Z980 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older Z980 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-05 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 201 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 gr (0.98 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $249 | $567 |