Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
68 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
![Kodak EasyShare Z980 front Kodak EasyShare Z980 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980.jpg)
![Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-Optio-WG-2-GPS/Pentax-WG-2-GPS-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Pentax. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The Z980 was brought out 4 years before the WG-2 GPS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Z980 scores against the WG-2 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
Z980 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Kodak Z980
WG-2 GPS | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 201k | Sharper screen (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
Z980 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Z980 vs the WG-2 GPS.
![Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-2-GPS-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and WG-2 GPS is 68 and 91 respectively.
![Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-2-GPS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Z980 and WG-2 GPS.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older Z980 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-2-GPS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-2-GPS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Pentax |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-01-05 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 201 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 grams (0.98 pounds) | 198 grams (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $249 | $300 |