Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3176/f3176bc983373a77b817a895387f9fe43857440a" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z980 front Kodak EasyShare Z980 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Z980 was released 6 years earlier than the WG-20 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the Z980 grades vs the WG-20 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Ricoh WG-20. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-20
Z980 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Kodak Z980
WG-20 | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 201k | Sharper display (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-20
Z980 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 features external measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-20 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Z980 compared to the WG-20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89c96/89c96f7abd7ca251bab05e00687a01eb38294d6f" alt="Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z980 and WG-20 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6657d/6657d59974a7214c1357901a16db7a7e307ebbb3" alt="Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z980 and WG-20.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-20 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older Z980 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7291/c7291b494f83e0fa37c0b6156659d858c642bbe6" alt="Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd106/fd1066e0e7cf487414dde566fb36f3bf2c253616" alt="Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-20 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 201 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) | 164 gr (0.36 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $249 | $370 |