Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Kodak Z980 versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z980 was revealed 9 years earlier than the WG-50 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Z980 matches up vs the WG-50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-50
| Z980 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Kodak Z980
| WG-50 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 102 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Crisper display (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-50
| Z980 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Z980 has physical dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z980 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Z980 and the WG-50.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and WG-50 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Z980 and WG-50.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to produce greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z980 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-05 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 201k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $280 |