Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Z980 was released 12 years prior to the WG-70 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Z980 matches up versus the WG-70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-70
| Z980 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Kodak Z980
| WG-70 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 134 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Crisper display (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-70
| Z980 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Z980 provides exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Z980 against the WG-70.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z980 and WG-70 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z980 and WG-70.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged Z980 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-05 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 201 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $249 | $280 |