Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z980 was unveiled 14 years earlier than the WG-80 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Z980 matches up against the WG-80 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-80
| Z980 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Kodak Z980
| WG-80 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 162 months |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Sharper screen (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-80
| Z980 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z980 offers outside dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Z980 against the WG-80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and WG-80 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z980 and WG-80.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-80 to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older Z980 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Display resolution | 201k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $300 |