Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z980 was introduced 6 years before the WG-M1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Z980 scores against the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Z980 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 201k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+86k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak Z980
| WG-M1 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Z980 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z980 offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Z980 against the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and WG-M1 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Z980 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to give more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z980 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 201 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $249 | $2,000 |