Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z980 was introduced 6 years before the WG-M1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Z980 scores against the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Z980 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 201k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+86k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak Z980
| WG-M1 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Z980 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z980 offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Z980 against the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and WG-M1 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Z980 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to give more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z980 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 201 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $249 | $2,000 |