Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Kodak Z980 versus Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z980 was announced 6 years earlier than the WB50F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z980 matches up against the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Samsung WB50F
| Z980 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Kodak Z980
| WB50F | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | January 2009 | More modern by 60 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 201k | Crisper screen (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Samsung WB50F
| Z980 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z980 has got physical measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z980 versus Samsung WB50F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Z980 compared to the WB50F.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and WB50F is 68 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z980 and WB50F.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB50F to produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z980 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z980 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 201k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $249 | $180 |