Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690
68 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
![Kodak EasyShare Z980 front Kodak EasyShare Z980 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W690/Sony-W690-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and W690 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The Z980 was unveiled 4 years prior to the W690 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Z980 scores versus the W690 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Sony W690
Z980 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Kodak Z980
W690 | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 201k | Sharper display (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Sony W690
Z980 | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z980 comes with outside measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Sony W690 has proportions of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the Z980 versus the W690.
![Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 size comparison Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W690-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and W690 is 68 and 95 respectively.
![Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W690-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The photograph below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z980 and W690.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony W690 to produce extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older Z980 will be behind in sensor innovation.
![Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W690-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z980-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W690-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z980 vs Sony W690 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 201 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 gr (0.98 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $249 | $297 |