Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
![Kodak EasyShare Z981 front Kodak EasyShare Z981 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Z981/Kodak-Z981-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix L830 front Nikon Coolpix L830 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-L830/Nikon-L830-front.jpg)
71 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-765mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 508g - 110 x 76 x 91mm
- Released January 2014
- Replaced the Nikon L820
- Refreshed by Nikon L840
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Kodak Z981 and Nikon L830, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the L830 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Z981 was unveiled 4 years prior to the L830 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Z981 grades versus the L830 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Nikon Coolpix L830. The full galleries are available at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Nikon L830 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Nikon L830
Z981 | L830 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon L830 over the Kodak Z981
L830 | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 201k | Clearer screen (+720k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Nikon L830
Z981 | L830 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z981 provides outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Nikon L830 has measurements of 110mm x 76mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.0" x 3.6") with a weight of 508 grams (1.12 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z981 and Nikon L830 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Z981 and the L830.
![Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 size comparison Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z981-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L830-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Z981 and L830 is 66 and 71 respectively.
![Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z981-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L830-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The visual here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z981 and L830.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon L830 to provide more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older Z981 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 sensor size comparison Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z981-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L830-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Z981-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L830-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon L830 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Nikon Coolpix L830 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Nikon Coolpix L830 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 23-765mm (33.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 201 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.20 m | 9.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p), 1280 x 960 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 540g (1.19 lbs) | 508g (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 110 x 76 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.0" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 shots |
Battery form | - | AA |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $299 | $300 |