Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Kodak Z981 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the Z981 (14MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Z981 was revealed 18 months later than the SP-565UZ which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Z981 grades vs the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| Z981 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Kodak Z981
| SP-565UZ | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Sharper screen (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| Z981 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z981 provides external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Kodak Z981 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Z981 vs the SP-565UZ.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z981 and SP-565UZ is 66 and 72 respectively.
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z981 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Kodak Z981 to render more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Z981 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Z981 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 201k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.20 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $400 |