Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z981 was brought out 24 months prior to the FZ200 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the Z981 scores vs the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Panasonic FZ200
Z981 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Kodak Z981
FZ200 | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | July 2010 | More recent by 24 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 201k | Sharper screen (+259k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200
Z981 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z981 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Z981 vs the FZ200.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Z981 and FZ200 is 66 and 65 respectively.
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z981 and FZ200.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Kodak Z981 to show extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older Z981 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 201 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.20 m | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 540g (1.19 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $299 | $499 |