Clicky

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
66
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37
Kodak EasyShare Z981 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Kodak Z981
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
  • Launched July 2010
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Z981 was brought out 24 months prior to the FZ200 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the Z981 scores vs the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Panasonic FZ200

 Z981 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Kodak Z981

 FZ200 Z981 
RevealedJuly 2012July 2010More recent by 24 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution460k201kSharper screen (+259k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200

 Z981 FZ200 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z981 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Z981 vs the FZ200.

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Z981 and FZ200 is 66 and 65 respectively.

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z981 and FZ200.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Kodak Z981 to show extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older Z981 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Z981
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ200
46
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
48
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000s)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Z981
Street photography with Panasonic FZ200
50
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (540 grams)
57
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (588g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z981 Sports photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography advice
43
incredible zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
46
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (540 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z981 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography highlights
53
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
long zoom (676mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (540 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
55
better than average battery life (540 CIPA)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (588 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z981 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Landscape photography camera
51
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse recording
48
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (540 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z981 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging advice
22
reasonably wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
heavier than others in class (540g)
63
rather wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have external mic support
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (588 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ200
 Kodak EasyShare Z981Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Make Kodak Panasonic
Model Kodak EasyShare Z981 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-07-06 2012-07-18
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-676mm (26.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.0 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 201 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 6.20 m 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 540g (1.19 lbs) 588g (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $299 $499