Clicky

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
66
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37
Kodak EasyShare Z981 front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
42
Overall
39

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Kodak Z981
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
  • Revealed July 2010
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Z981 was revealed 18 months earlier than the WB150F which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the Z981 grades versus the WB150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Samsung WB150F

 Z981 WB150F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Kodak Z981

 WB150F Z981 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012July 2010More recent by 18 months
Screen resolution460k201kCrisper screen (+259k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB150F

 Z981 WB150F 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z981 enjoys exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Z981 versus the WB150F.

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Z981 and WB150F is 66 and 93 respectively.

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z981 and WB150F.

As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of images although you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The older Z981 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Z981
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
46
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
42
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Z981 Street photography details
Samsung WB150F Street photography details
50
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than average (540g)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (188g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z981 Sports photography info
Samsung WB150F Sports photography info
43
excellent zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
51
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Z981
Travel photography with Samsung WB150F
53
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
very long reach (676mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than average (540 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competition in class (188 grams)
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z981 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography details
51
focusing manually
relatively wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse function
49
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z981 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB150F as a Vlogging camera
22
relatively wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
heavier than average (540 grams)
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (188 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB150F
 Kodak EasyShare Z981Samsung WB150F
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z981 Samsung WB150F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-07-06 2012-01-09
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-676mm (26.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.0 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 201k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.20 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 540 grams (1.19 lb) 188 grams (0.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $299 $230