Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replaced the Sony HX300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Z981 (14MP) and HX400V (20MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z981 was unveiled 4 years before the HX400V which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Z981 matches up vs the HX400V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The full galleries are available at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Sony HX400V
| Z981 | HX400V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Kodak Z981
| HX400V | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 201k | Sharper screen (+720k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Sony HX400V
| Z981 | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z981 has got outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Sony HX400V has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Z981 compared to the HX400V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z981 and HX400V is 66 and 62 respectively.
Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z981 and HX400V.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX400V to render more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged Z981 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z981 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 201 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.20 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 grams (1.19 lbs) | 660 grams (1.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $299 | $448 |