Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200
Portability
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
Kodak Z990
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is EasyShare Max
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
Photography Glossary Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Z990 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z990 was brought out 18 months earlier than the FZ200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z990 matches up versus the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z990 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Panasonic FZ200
| Z990 | FZ200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Kodak Z990
| FZ200 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Panasonic FZ200
| Z990 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Z990 features outer measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 compared to the FZ200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z990 and FZ200 is 68 and 65 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The pic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z990 and FZ200.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you will need to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged Z990 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak Z990 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000s)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Kodak Z990 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (588g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Kodak Z990 Sports photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography advice
long zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps low (6.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (540 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Kodak Z990
Travel photography with Panasonic FZ200
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (840mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
better than average battery pack (540 shots)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (588 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Kodak Z990
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ200
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (540 per charge)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Kodak Z990 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic socket
decently wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external microphone port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competitors in class (588g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z990 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Otherwise known as | EasyShare Max | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.90 m | 13.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 540 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $299 | $499 |
