Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Kodak Z990 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z990 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Z990 scores against the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z990 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Samsung WB35F
Z990 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Kodak Z990
WB35F | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Samsung WB35F
Z990 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z990 comes with physical dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z990 versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Z990 against the WB35F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Z990 and WB35F is 68 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z990 and WB35F.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Z990 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB35F |
Otherwise known as | EasyShare Max | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.90 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $299 | $130 |