Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V
Portability
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Portability
66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Kodak Z990
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also referred to as EasyShare Max
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Previous Model is Sony HX100V
- Newer Model is Sony HX300
Photography Glossary Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak Z990 and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z990 was manufactured 16 months prior to the HX200V making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Z990 grades vs the HX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z990 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Sony HX200V
| Z990 | HX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Kodak Z990
| HX200V | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 16 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Sony HX200V
| Z990 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z990 has outer dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z990 and Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 and the HX200V.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Z990 and HX200V is 68 and 66 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The picture below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z990 and HX200V.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony HX200V to produce more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z990 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak Z990 Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX200V Portrait photography highlights
you can focus manually
features face detect focusing
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
manual focus
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Kodak Z990
Street photography with Sony HX200V
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than others in class (583g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Kodak Z990 Sports photography features
Sony HX200V Sports photography features
incredible zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (6.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery (450 CIPA)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Kodak Z990 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
better than average battery (450 CIPA)
megapixel count good (18MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (27mm)
great zoom (810mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (583g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Kodak Z990 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
manual focus
decently wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
better than average battery (450 per charge)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Kodak Z990 Vlogging factors
Sony HX200V Vlogging factors
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of mic jack
decently wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (583g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sony |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Also Known as | EasyShare Max | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.90 m | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lb) | 583g (1.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $299 | $480 |