Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z990 was brought out 3 years before the HX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Z990 scores versus the HX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z990 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Sony HX300
Z990 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Kodak Z990
HX300 | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Sony HX300
Z990 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z990 offers physical measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 vs the HX300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z990 and HX300 is 68 and 63 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z990 and HX300.
Clearly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX300 to give greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Z990 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Also called as | EasyShare Max | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.90 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) | 623 gr (1.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $299 | $339 |