Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
Photography Glossary Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus FE-5020, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Easyshare M5370 was unveiled 2 years after the FE-5020 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Easyshare M5370 grades against the FE-5020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus FE-5020
| Easyshare M5370 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 27 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| FE-5020 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus FE-5020
| Easyshare M5370 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the FE-5020.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and FE-5020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and FE-5020.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher Easyshare M5370 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also referred to as | - | X-935 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-09-14 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $160 | $160 |