Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Easyshare M5370 was released 2 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the Easyshare M5370 grades vs the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| Easyshare M5370 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | January 2009 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| SP-565UZ | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| Easyshare M5370 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 offers external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Easyshare M5370 and the SP-565UZ.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and SP-565UZ is 95 and 72 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and SP-565UZ.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to give you more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Easyshare M5370 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-09-14 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $160 | $400 |