Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ea1a/5ea1a2dcd0db3a5f518a33b0c5b509e82763f6fa" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed39c86a4f12fb37f0ee7bf73ec9c47fc264c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Easyshare M5370 was released 3 years prior to the SH-1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Easyshare M5370 grades vs the SH-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus Stylus SH-1. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus SH-1
Easyshare M5370 | SH-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
SH-1 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 30 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus SH-1
Easyshare M5370 | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the SH-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca612/ca61234807ea248dca23579f0f10120712ae22ce" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and SH-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de2c3/de2c389c60b2a594cb2477476960faf3e52b7d6d" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and SH-1.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you should expect similar quality of pictures though you need to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The older Easyshare M5370 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/329b5/329b504aacd0ba508dbe220b674cfade209a57a7" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec949/ec949e441e56fa4db4f4cdb1e5b920ab64549308" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-14 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $160 | $349 |