Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced September 2011
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Easyshare M5370 was announced 21 months after the Tough-3000 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up against the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 Easyshare M5370 Tough-3000 
ReleasedSeptember 2011January 2010More modern by 21 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 Tough-3000 Easyshare M5370 

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus Tough-3000

 Easyshare M5370 Tough-3000 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 against the Tough-3000.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and Tough-3000 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and Tough-3000.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Easyshare M5370 provides an advantage in sensor tech.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Portrait photography camera
34
good resolution (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
21
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Street photography with Olympus Tough-3000
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Sports photography with Olympus Tough-3000
29
good resolution (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography advice
Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography advice
72
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
61
weather proofing
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography details
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography details
43
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
35
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging advice
Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging advice
32
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
has face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also called as - mju Tough 3000
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2011-09-14 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range 5cm 2cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-1, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 gr (0.33 lbs) 159 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Storage type MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $160 $0