Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus TG-810, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Easyshare M5370 was revealed within a month of the TG-810 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up versus the TG-810 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus TG-810
| Easyshare M5370 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| TG-810 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-810
| Easyshare M5370 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | August 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 offers outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus TG-810 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the TG-810.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and TG-810 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and TG-810.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-09-14 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-1, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $428 |