Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370.jpg)
![Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS/Olympus-TG-1-iHS-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The Easyshare M5370 was introduced 7 months prior to the TG-1 iHS and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up against the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
Easyshare M5370 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
TG-1 iHS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 7 months |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
Easyshare M5370 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the TG-1 iHS.
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and TG-1 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Easyshare M5370 and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to show greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older Easyshare M5370 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-1-iHS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-09-14 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $160 | $399 |