Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched September 2011
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Launched April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • New Model is Olympus TG-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

Here is a complete review of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus TG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Easyshare M5370 was launched 4 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Easyshare M5370 scores vs the TG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus TG-4

          

          

            
 Easyshare M5370 TG-4 
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

          

          

            
 TG-4 Easyshare M5370 
LaunchedApril 2015September 2011Fresher by 43 months
Manual focus  Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-4

          

          

            
 Easyshare M5370 TG-4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the TG-4.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and TG-4.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of images though you will want to consider the launch date  of the cameras into account. The older Easyshare M5370 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

            Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Portrait photography camera
 Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
34
 MP count good (16MP)
 supports face detect focusing
 lack of manual focus
 manual exposure not possible
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
46
 you can focus manually
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 offers face detection autofocus
 exports RAW files
 no manual mode
 no external flash support
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
 Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Street photography camera
 Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
48
 no articulating screen
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 weather proof
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
 Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
29
 MP count good (16MP)
 no shutter priority mode
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect AF
47
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 weather proof
 good battery power (380 shots)
 slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography info
72
 MP count good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 great maximum aperture (f)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 display isn't selfie friendly
74
 good battery power (380 shots)
 weather proof
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 really wide (25mm)
 good max aperture (f2.0)
 more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography highlights
42
 relatively wide (28mm)
 great maximum aperture (f)
 screen is a good size (3")
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 manual exposure not possible
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
 lack of Timelapse mode
62
 you can focus manually
 really wide (25mm)
 good max aperture (f2.0)
 screen is a decent size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 exports RAW files
 weather proof
 good battery power (380 per charge)
 cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 no manual mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging factors
32
 relatively wide (28mm)
 great maximum aperture (f)
 touchscreen functionality
 supports face detect focusing
 display isn't selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 lack of microphone support
34
 really wide (25mm)
 good max aperture (f2.0)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection autofocus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 missing external microphone jack
 more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
Photography Glossary
        
                
        

          

            
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-4
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Olympus Tough TG-4
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2011-09-14 2015-04-13
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 3.20 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-1, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lbs) 247 grams (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $160 $379