Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Easyshare M5370 was launched 2 months after the VR-320 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Easyshare M5370 scores vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus VR-320
| Easyshare M5370 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| VR-320 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-320
| Easyshare M5370 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the VR-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and VR-320.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-09-14 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $160 | $179 |
