Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched September 2011
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

The following is a complete comparison of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Easyshare M5370 was brought out 8 months after the VR-330 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus VR-330

 Easyshare M5370 VR-330 
LaunchedSeptember 2011February 2011Newer by 8 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 VR-330 Easyshare M5370 
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-330

 Easyshare M5370 VR-330 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the VR-330.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and VR-330.

Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to show extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger Easyshare M5370 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
34
decent MP (16MP)
features face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
33
MP count good (14MP)
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography info
29
decent MP (16MP)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
72
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography advice
43
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
42
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
32
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
features face detection focusing
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
32
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-330
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Olympus VR-330
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-09-14 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-1, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 gr (0.33 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $160 $220