Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced September 2011
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Easyshare M5370 was announced 3 months before the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus VR-340

 Easyshare M5370 VR-340 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 VR-340 Easyshare M5370 
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-340

 Easyshare M5370 VR-340 
IntroducedSeptember 2011January 2012Similar age
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the VR-340.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and VR-340 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and VR-340.

As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of images but you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography info
34
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
34
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (125g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
29
good resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography factors
72
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than average (125 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography features
43
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
good resolution (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
43
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
32
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
touchscreen
supports face detect focusing
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
33
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than average (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-340
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Olympus VR-340
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Olympus VR-340
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-09-14 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-1, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lb) 125 grams (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $160 $130