Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Easyshare M5370 was announced 3 months before the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus VR-340
| Easyshare M5370 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| VR-340 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VR-340
| Easyshare M5370 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 | January 2012 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the VR-340.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and VR-340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and VR-340.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of images but you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-09-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $160 | $130 |