Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Easyshare M5370 was manufactured 15 months before the XZ-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Easyshare M5370 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
XZ-2 iHS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | September 2011 | More modern by 15 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Easyshare M5370 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 offers external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Easyshare M5370 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Easyshare M5370 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Easyshare M5370 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Easyshare M5370 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-09-14 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-1, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $160 | $450 |