Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
- Launched January 2015
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the SZ10 (16MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Easyshare M5370 was launched 4 years prior to the SZ10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Easyshare M5370 grades against the SZ10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Panasonic SZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Panasonic SZ10
| Easyshare M5370 | SZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| SZ10 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 | September 2011 | More modern by 40 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Panasonic SZ10
| Easyshare M5370 | SZ10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 offers external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Panasonic SZ10 has proportions of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the SZ10.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and SZ10 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and SZ10.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you might want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged Easyshare M5370 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-09-14 | 2015-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.4 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $160 | $200 |