Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Pentax. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Easyshare M5370 was announced 8 months later than the WG-1 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up against the WG-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Pentax Optio WG-1. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Pentax WG-1
| Easyshare M5370 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 |  | February 2011 | More recent by 8 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| WG-1 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Pentax WG-1
| Easyshare M5370 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Easyshare M5370 against the WG-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and WG-1 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and WG-1.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to give you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The more modern Easyshare M5370 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-09-14 | 2011-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $160 | $350 |