Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37


92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Ricoh CX4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The Easyshare M5370 was introduced 14 months after the CX4 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up vs the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Ricoh CX4
Easyshare M5370 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
CX4 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh CX4
Easyshare M5370 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the CX4.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and CX4 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and CX4.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to deliver more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer Easyshare M5370 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh CX4 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-09-14 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $160 | $211 |