Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced September 2011
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

The following is a in-depth overview of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Ricoh CX4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Easyshare M5370 was introduced 14 months after the CX4 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up vs the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Ricoh CX4

 Easyshare M5370 CX4 
ReleasedSeptember 2011August 2010Newer by 14 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 CX4 Easyshare M5370 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh CX4

 Easyshare M5370 CX4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the CX4.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and CX4 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and CX4.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to deliver more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer Easyshare M5370 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography advice
34
MP count good (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
26
focusing manually
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Street photography features
Ricoh CX4 Street photography features
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography features
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
29
MP count good (16MP)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low frames per second (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography details
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography details
72
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
66
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography information
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography information
43
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
42
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging advice
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging advice
32
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
comes with face detection focus
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
30
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh CX4
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Ricoh CX4
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Ricoh CX4
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-09-14 2010-08-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-1, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lb) 205 grams (0.45 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $160 $211