Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Easyshare M5370 was launched 2 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up against the GR Digital III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Easyshare M5370 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 26 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
GR Digital III | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh GR Digital III
Easyshare M5370 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 comes with external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Easyshare M5370 and the GR Digital III.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and GR Digital III.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Easyshare M5370 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Easyshare M5370 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-09-14 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $160 | $399 |