Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released September 2011
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Photography Glossary

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Here is a in-depth overview of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Easyshare M5370 was announced within a month of the GR Digital IV which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Easyshare M5370 scores versus the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Easyshare M5370 GR Digital IV 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 GR Digital IV Easyshare M5370 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Easyshare M5370 GR Digital IV 
RevealedSeptember 2011September 2011Same generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the GR Digital IV.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Easyshare M5370 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 will produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography advice
34
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
41
focusing manually
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Street photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography factors
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
29
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery power (390 per charge)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography factors
72
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
67
better than average battery power (390 shots)
built-in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography info
43
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
53
focusing manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
32
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
has touchscreen
includes face detect focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic port
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-09-14 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-1, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $160 $599