Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Easyshare M5370 was manufactured 3 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up against the WG-4 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Easyshare M5370 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| WG-4 GPS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 29 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Easyshare M5370 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has got outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images however you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Easyshare M5370 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-09-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $160 | $210 |