Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photography Glossary Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Easyshare M5370 was introduced 4 years prior to the WG-M1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Easyshare M5370 grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Easyshare M5370 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| WG-M1 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | September 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Easyshare M5370 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the WG-M1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Easyshare M5370 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-09-14 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $160 | $2,000 |