Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung DV300F

Here, we are contrasting the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Easyshare M5370 was unveiled 3 months before the DV300F so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the DV300F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Samsung DV300F. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.

For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 enjoys outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung DV300F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the DV300F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and DV300F is 95 and 96 respectively.

Often, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and DV300F.

To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photos although you might want to consider the age of the products into consideration.