Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
95
Imaging
38
Features
35
Overall
36
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
32
Features
17
Overall
26

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released September 2011
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Easyshare M5370 was introduced 2 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Easyshare M5370 grades against the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Samsung SL202

 Easyshare M5370 SL202 
LaunchedSeptember 2011February 2009Fresher by 32 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 SL202 Easyshare M5370 

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung SL202

 Easyshare M5370 SL202 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 features physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the SL202.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and SL202.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher Easyshare M5370 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography details
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography details
34
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
24
supports face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
46
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography advice
Samsung SL202 Sports photography advice
29
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
72
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
57
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography features
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography features
42
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
26
relatively wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL202 Vlogging highlights
32
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen functionality
comes with face detect focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone jack
27
relatively wide (28mm)
supports face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung SL202
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Samsung SL202
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak Easyshare M5370 Samsung SL202
Also called as - PL50
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-09-14 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 5cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format MPEG-1, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150g (0.33 lbs) 168g (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $160 $140