Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Easyshare M5370 was introduced 2 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Easyshare M5370 grades against the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Samsung SL202
| Easyshare M5370 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 32 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| SL202 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung SL202
| Easyshare M5370 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 features physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the SL202.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and SL202.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher Easyshare M5370 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-09-14 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $140 |