Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370.jpg)
![Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB30F/Samsung-WB30F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The Easyshare M5370 was launched 16 months earlier than the WB30F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up versus the WB30F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Samsung WB30F
Easyshare M5370 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
WB30F | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 16 months |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung WB30F
Easyshare M5370 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 provides outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 and the WB30F.
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Samsung-WB30F-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and WB30F is 95 and 96 respectively.
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Samsung-WB30F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and WB30F.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files though you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The older Easyshare M5370 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Samsung-WB30F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Easyshare-M5370-vs-Samsung-WB30F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Samsung WB30F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-09-14 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $160 | $180 |