Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Revealed September 2011
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Lets look more closely at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Easyshare M5370 was unveiled 16 months before the WB800F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Easyshare M5370 matches up against the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Samsung WB800F

 Easyshare M5370 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 WB800F Easyshare M5370 
LaunchedJanuary 2013September 2011Fresher by 16 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung WB800F

 Easyshare M5370 WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the WB800F.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and WB800F.

Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of images although you might want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older Easyshare M5370 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
34
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
focusing manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
29
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
52
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB800F Travel photography factors
72
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (218g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
43
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3 inch)
megapixel count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
49
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB800F as a Vlogging camera
32
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
touchscreen
includes face detect focus
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Samsung WB800F
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-09-14 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-1, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lbs) 218 grams (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $160 $300